Accommodating and compromising www datingadvicebookguide com
Using the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) to identify five discrete conflict styles, we started with an overview of the model and styles.In the second post, we looked at the advantages and disadvantages of using Competing and Avoiding styles.However, once a person becomes aware of behavioral patterns, as revealed by two or three highest versus lowest percentile modes, that awareness can then lead to dramatic behavioral change with training, patience, and practice.Sometime later (maybe a few weeks or a few months), a subsequent TKI assessment will reveal a more balanced profile with lower scores on competing, accommodating, and compromising and higher scores on collaborating and avoiding.
Compromising is an effective style when you have exhausted your other options for reaching an agreement.
Competing works best when the topic is much more important to me than it is to you. And if the topic is only somewhat important to both of us (and we don’t have a lot of time to discuss it anyway), we might as well divide up the pie in equal portions and move on to other topics.
The danger of these conflict modes on the distributive dimension, however, is when a person’s two or three highest modes on the TKI profile are some combination of competing, accommodating, and compromising (while the other modes are assessed as medium or low).
Competing is assertive and uncooperative: I get my needs met, but you don’t get your needs met.
Accommodating is just the opposite—unassertive and cooperative: You get your needs met, but I don’t get my needs met.